Sean D’Souza’s latest ‘PsychoTactics’ article is titled “How ‘Knew’ and ‘New’ Factors Create Intensely Powerful Headlines”. [PsychoTactics Article]


Sean D’Souza’s latest ‘PsychoTactics’ article:

How ‘Knew’ and ‘New’ Factors Create Intensely Powerful Headlines

by Sean D’Souza

Headline-writing for articles is like witchcraft.

You have to know the spells, and chant before you can create awesome headlines, right?

Nah!

What you really need is a factor of ‘new’

And ‘knew.’

So what do I mean by ‘new’ and ‘knew?’

‘New’ is kinda obvious. If you have something ‘new’ in the headline, then the reader is instantly interested.

The curiosity trigger is launched, and the reader wants to know what’s next.

But if your entire headline had a factor of ‘new’ you’d cause anxiety, not curiosity.

And let’s look at a few examples to see what I mean. Let’s go back into the last century to the year, 1999. And being 1999, you’ve heard nothing about the iPod. Or podcasts. Or RSS.

And your headline read: How to create RSS podcasts with the iPod.

Aha, it’s all ‘new’ information, if you’re still stuck in 1999, right?

So why did it cause your brain to go waka-waka?

Because it’s all new. And running into all new, is like running into an InDesign Toolbar with five-hundred palettes.

Or a strange city where you don’t quite know your way round.

Notice what I just did?

I put two scenarios in front of you:

1) InDesign Tool Bar with five-hundred palettes.

2) A strange city where you don’t know your way around.

And if you know ‘InDesign’, you’ll have coasted through both the analogies in a few seconds. But even if you didn’t know what the heck ‘InDesign or palettes’ are, the second example of the ‘strange city’ would be something you could quite easily relate to.

The concept of the ‘strange city’ is the factor of ‘knew.’

And ‘knew’ is something you know.

While ‘new’ is something that’s kinda unknown.

So how do we use this magic spell for article headlines?

We mix the ‘new’ and the ‘knew’. Throw a bat wing or two. And some shitake mushrooms. Et Voila, we have a bunch of headlines that looketh like this:

1) Why the ‘Yes-Yes’ Factor Help You Raise Prices.

2) Is There Too Much Sugar In Your Testimonials?

3) The Critical Importance of Sandwiching Your Articles.

4) How Segues Reduce Friction in Sales.

5) Why Consumption is More Important Than Attraction and Conversion.

You noticed, didn’t you?

There were ‘new’ elements in the copy. And there were ‘knew’ elements. Some things you recognised right away. And others that did drive you to curiosity.

The factor of ‘new’ attracted you, but equally important, the ‘knew’ signaled what topic was being covered.

So you can clearly see that the five topics are about:

1) Raising Prices.

2) Testimonials.

3) Something to do with Article-Writing.

4) Reducing Friction in Sales.

5) Something that’s more important than Attraction and Conversion.

When the ‘new’ and the ‘knew’ mix, they create dynamite

Too much ‘new’ and the headline is intimidating as hell.

Too much ‘knew’ and a yawn, and a siesta come to mind.

But the question will no doubt arise: Do you need to write every headline with ‘new’ and ‘knew?’

And the answer is no. This article isn’t a formula for every article headline. There are other ways to get curiosity.

And a smart way to write article headlines is to mix and match.

Headlines with a ‘How To’ factor do really well.

Headlines with questions do really well.

But headlines with ‘new’ and ‘knew’ have a certain magic, and cast a spell.

But use the spell sparingly, ok!

Sean D’Souza

2001-2005 Psychotactics Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Wouldn’t you love to stumble upon a secret library of small business ideas? Find simple, yet electrifying ideas, on copywriting, public speaking, marketing strategies, sales conversion, psychological tactics and branding. Head down to http://www.psychotactics.com today and judge for yourself. Psychotactics Subscription Page

*IMNewswatch would like to thank Sean D’Souza and Psychotactics for granting permission to reprint this latest article.